To What Extent Are Organizations Socially Constructed Phenomena Coursework - 3

To What Extent Are Organizations Socially Constructed Phenomena - Coursework ExampleThe present constitution has identified that after studying the patterns of cultural evolution, the writer of this paper is inclined towards the belief that there is a significant amount of similarity in the manner in which culture is manifested in business organizations and in auberge in superior general (Rollinson et al, 1998 Morgan, 1998). To get wind cultural diversity in organizations, it would be helpful to understand its roots at a sociological level. Cultural diversity in the workplace is a condition result of multiculturalism in society. A multicultural society simply denotes a society in which there exist several cultures (Watson, 2000). Culture is defined as, A pattern of shargond assumptions a throng larn as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration that has worked well enough to be considered reasonable and, therefore, to be taught to new members as t he correct way you think, perceive, and feel in relation to those problems (Schein, 2003). So, multicultural society has in it different groups, which have learned different ways of thinking, perceiving, and tackling problems that exist in the society. Each group taken mortally is a society on its own, with its own individual culture. When all these individual societies are brought under one single core society, the culture of such a society becomes the core culture, with the individual cultures as its subcultures (Watson, 2002). A peaceful co-existence of the subcultures depends on the way the core culture is structured and shaped. Culture is a sensitive term even today and it still has the ability to invoke an emotional and nostalgic tie beam with an individuals distinctive way of life, and speaks directly to their sense of identity and belonging (Watson, 2002). A general view of cultural differences is that they affect intercultural encounters, usually by leading to misundersta nding or conflict, at twain the individual and group levels (Larkey, 1996).