Shakespere on Management Essay -- William Shakespeare Plays Essays

Shakespeare on ManagementI never knew that Shakespeare had to do with management, plainly after reading this book it made me realize the true grandness of being a manager, and the way that real managers act toward their employees. I utilise to think that Management was just about heavy(p) orders and keeping the worry on track but after reading this book I recognized that there is a lot much to management than that. Shakespeare wrote plays that were all-embracing of contradiction and ambiguity. He chose many disparate dramatic ways of build ambiguity into his plays. He used strong characters, fools, and scoundrels to give his leaders different messages. The world of Management also has its ambiguities, and when it doesnt recognize this it fails. What managers do-nothing turn back from this book is that there are hoi polloi who have similar problems to ours and we can learn from their experience.Every book argues that without leaders, managers and businesses leave alone fa il, along with the idea that lead is the quality that is missing every day of real managers. Shakespeares characters demo different ways that leadership could be provided. Until the sixteenth century, almost everybody believed that leaders were born and not made. Shakespeare argued about this point of view. Some of the leaders that he created failed because they based their strength on the fact that they were born to be leaders. In Shakespeares (Peter and Waterman, 1982 75) the point that Peters is trying to make is that swell leaders make meanings for their staff, which means that they provide their staff with the importance of communicating motivation. In Shakespeares Henry the fifths speech during the strife of Harfleur. They are in a war with the French, but the French has a strong defense and Henrys troops start giving up. Henry makes a speech to them that truly gives an example of leadership. Once more unto the breach, dear friends once more Or close the wall up with our English deadOn on, you noblest English,Whose blood is fet from fathers of war-proofFathers that, like so many Alexanders, Have in these parts from morn til even fought And cover their swords for lack of argumentDishonour not your mothers now attestThat those whom you echod fathers did beget youFor there is none of you so mean and base,That hath not noble luster in your eyes.... ...p Peters contains a warning to all managers, disagreeing that if you wear outt succeed in paying attention to the microscopic people, you will fail because sooner or later, they will get you back. They have the power to stop even the greatest leaders. I think Shakespeare really believes this, it shows by dint of his plays how he has leaders listen to people and how he gives the little people strong characters. The reason that both Shakespeare and Tom Peters give for managers to listen to the little people is not only because it is of good morals for managers to do so but also because it is necessary in order to run a company. In Shakespeares plays the consequences of poor leadership are almost certain heads roll, people fall on their swords, bodies fall to the stage. Although the outcome isnt as severe for most managers, many leaders still make the misidentify of becoming royal leaders when thats not the role they should be playing. In Shakespeares plays, as the author plainly demonstrates, successful leadership is not the result of just being born to do it. end-to-end his plays, the most successful leaders are those who earn their position and the remark of those around them.