The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Anton Ermakov Period 4 US History Essay The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki On August 6th, 1945, the unify States dropped an atomic barrage on Hiroshima, Japan, and hence, three days later, dropped a nonher bomb on Nagasaki. Since both bombs were dropped, there has been controversy over this central event. both(prenominal) people feel strongly that the United States was justified in the determination to drop the bombs, whereas many other people believe that it was not undeniable to bomb Japan at that topographic point in the war.Write a five-paragraph see in which you state your opinion on this difficult issue and then explain, describe, and support your point of view with examples and details. The atomic bombings of the Nipponese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki occupy an important place among the most controversial events in the history of humanity. Even though almost seventy years passes since these events, their morality and justification are save questioned extensiv ely by both scholars and ordinary people.In my opinion, the bombings were a grim necessity, which gave the US an chance to avoid heavy casualties and conclude the war triumphantly. In this essay, I am going to explain my views and provide arguments in favor of my point of view. Personally, I believe that using the deadliest tool ever created by a man played a crucial role in withering the Japanese morale and battle spirit. At the end of World contend II, the Japanese society was heavily militarized and fanatically devoted to servicing Emperor Hirohito, who was viewed as a living god by his subjects.Therefore, the wide country of Japan lived by the warrior code of bushido, ready to fight for the denial of their mainland. Despite this fatalistic readiness for a final fight, the Japanese were not ready for experiencing the terror of atomic warfare. The tragic events at Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced the Japanese nation to abandon their will to fight to death, causing the Japanes e brass to agree with the American terms of surrender. Second of all, I believe that the bombings in truth helped save tens of housands of lives from both sides of the conflict by helping the US phalanx to bypass the need for a massive invasion of the Japanese mainland. earlier the completion of the Manhattan Project, the military planned to mount an invasion from the newly-captured islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Considering the surpass of the defensive preparations conducted by the Japanese government leads to me to believe that a ceremonious invasion of Japan would result in a massive public figure of American casualties. The operation of this magnitude would also be extremely libellous for the civilian population of Japan.These reasons make me believe that the unfortunate eradication of the two Japanese cities was a lesser evil. Finally the atomic bombings provided the United States with an opportunity to establish its position as a new superpower, demonstrating its mil itary cogency to the prospective rival superpower of the USSR. Even though demonstrating the capabilities of a weapon of such destructive power on the civilian population is unimpeachably immoral, it was the best way to showcase the atomic bomb, which eventually became an important addition in keeping the Soviet aggression in check.By using nuclear weapons in combat, the US managed to get an upper hand in an archaean arms race with the Soviet Union and maintain that position until the test of the first Soviet nuclear bomb in 1949. In conclusion, I would like to say that, even though the bombing raids on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in tens of thousands of civilian deaths, they were instrumental in overcoming the stubborn resistance of the Japanese government, livery the war to an end, and saving a far greater number of lives in other Japanese cities. Beyond all doubt, these events are tragic, but they should not be perceived as a horrible and unnecessary atrocity.