Untitled

TO: ERIK BAUM BY: BORJAFRAILE Created by pepe sa Sex in the Net!         A social and ethical es think task, designed to show students with a Broader insight into both the lucre and computer ethics.         Since the beginning of time, custody and women hasten fantasised over tender bodies. obscenity has always been a assort of bread and butter and yet it has n evermore been so right away available as what it is now. tickling stories, explicit pictures, XXX- rated films and modern solar daytime magazines, ar exclusively type of the stimulus corporeal which is cognize as porn or as it is legally put, obscenity. Is it ethically right for our children to be feeling at this erotic material at much(prenominal) an early duration? Do we consume a twisted sense of morals if we support vulgarism? Or is it full a natural part of life that should be nurtured and further?         These school principals and more be springing to peoples lips as we immortalize the technological age. The age of the earnings. Never before has soot been so pronto available. Through mail-order, at secret places around the schoolyard, or but down at the local brisksagent or painting store, pornography net be purchased in some(prenominal) form or media. I know children, some as young as ten years, who have an unlimited planning of pornography. They have been open to it from an early age and it has become an dependence like take or drinking. Part of the line of work is that ostracizeship laws be non enforced. close to newsagents go out sell a twelve year old, pornography, (legal age of 18) but will not sell them a bundle of cig bettes (legal age of 16 until June 1994). The provable derivative from this claimment, is that fines and punishments for selling pornography to underage souls, be not high enough. So why dont we raise them? The answer to this question can be tack together on the screen of both computer in the world. ! The lucre, or as one person put it, The closest function to true anarchy that has ever existed.         How is one to criminalize the Internet when it is literally unthinkable? What is the consumption of placing fines for copying pornography when it is inconceivable to tell the age of the user. How can one even observe the user when there are twenty-five billion members and it is impossible to follow them all. How can we scratch the pornography when a new batch arrives every day and it is impossible to stop it.          other depict which makes censoring rocky is the fact that censorship laws have tho recently world needful. In England for instance, censorship laws have, for hundreds of years, saturated on heretic materials, where as now, they are finding that the solely offence censorship is accept to prevent, is pornography. The US excessively postulate to put strict censorship on all abominable material, however the first ame ndment of their piece of music postulates that, their shall be no law abridging the freedom of speech or press, and so they are finding it difficult to step around, the law.         It is explicit that people are putting an effort in to censor the pornography, however when it comes to illegalise material which goes all over the world, a balance mustiness be nominate in the midst of the censorship laws of all the countries that are hooked into the net. Here a problem arises, because Denmark has no censorship of pornography, so obviously they are leaving to be somewhat annoyed if it is banned from the Internet since their laws state that it is perfectly legal. So an line of products occurs. How is the world to censor the Internet without causing discrepancies between the different countries? Indeed, some people say, wherefore bother?         So far, you have seen that there would be a great barrier involved in censoring the Internet. So th e other pitying face of the blood, presented by th! e economists and pornography fanatics, is that, why should we censor the Internet when perchance it is not needed. There are umteen people in the world who will tell you that pornography is a benignant part of life. Artists will tell you that the in the raw body is a picture of beauty, grace and style. Authorities in Denmark will say that pornography is a valued part of their society and psychologists will tell you that pornography reduces the rate of internal abuse and rape. Indeed, the human body is a natural part of life in all of its forms, so why do we regard the naked body as been obscene. Is it not stated in the password that comprehension told us to where clothes? And did it not too state that theology did not fate us to have wisdom? So can it not also be said, that God did not want us to put one over clothes and so therefore, he was encouraging pornography? This purpose seems to demolish the religious fanatics who say that we will burn in hell for flavo ur at obscene materials.         After expression at both sides of the argument, it is obvious to see that some centerfield point must be reached between the two. Pornography on the Internet cannot be totally band and yet it cannot be accessed by any(prenominal) user as our societys ethics are against children looking at pornography. A set of ethics or laws must be devised that will satisfy each and every land which is on the Internet. It must be devised by a governance party such as the United Nations, or by a committee which has representatives from each country.         My evaluation of the argument and my recommendations are as follows, Pornography which is stored on the Internet must be placed in an area which can be accessed only by a password, as well as appointment which proves that the user is over eighteen. (eg A drivers license number.) Pornography which is found on public bulletin boards must be deleted immediately. This is the r esponsibility of not only the governing committee, bu! t also the user. Files which are identified as pornography are to be traced and any under eighteen users are to be fined accordingly. viewing hearing of pornography who are over eighteen are to rest strictly confidential. No personal data is to be released unless it is undeniable for National Security ecetera.         The above recommendations, if carried out on the Internet, would exit the world with a pornography-safe network, one that could be used by children and adults alike across the globe. Bibliography 1)         The Electronic Encyclopedia, Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc, 1990 2)         Times Magazine, syndicate Button, December 13th, 1993 3) Times Magazine, Philip Elmer-Dewitt, July 25th, 1994 4) Pornography and Silence, Susan Griffin, 1981 5)         Literature, Obcenity and the Law, Felix Lewis, 1976 6) The End of Obscenity, Charles Rembar, 1968 7) Pornography, Obsceni ty and the Law, Lester Sobel, 1978 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper